While the term
“Enemies List” conjures up memories of Richard Nixon, tempting us
to avoid making such a compilation, the critical lack of enemies is
such that we feel a duty find an answer. National Football League
teams have difficulty paring down their rosters to the fifty-three
player maximum. Identifying the ten people who constitute the most
serious threats to our well-being is a far more onerous task, so much
so that we've cheated a little, including twelve people* to the top
ten list. So many players, so few positions available
Our readers have not
been helpful, offering no suggestions of what we should do to find
useful enemies. As to who the real enemies of the moment are, we
will admit that it may be nationalistic hubris on our part, together
with a lack of extensive knowledge of the villains lurking in other
parts of the world, but we simply cannot think of anyone outside the
USA who poses as great a threat to the world as do a large number of
people operating within the country.
In ascending order,
here are our choices for the ten foremost enemies of the American
people and, in a variant of trickle down theory, of the peace and
prosperity of the world:
10. Betsy DeVos-
US Secretary of Education. Betsy De Vos has devoted a significant
amount of her life and much of her considerable wealth to destroying
public education in the US and now she is in a position to wreak ever
more havoc. She might be too clueless to make this list but she gets
extra points for being the sister of Eric Prince, founder of
Blackwater. In a tight race she was named worst of the worst of the Swamp Cabinet by NYT readers. If American education should fail, other countries,
from Finland to China, will continue to provide quality education,
but a further rapid decline in knowledge in the USA does not bode
well for the future of the planet.
9. Scott Pruitt-
Head of the Environmental Protection Agency- The entire swamp cabinet
is a vast collective threat to the security of the world. It's hard
to pick the worst of the bunch (see the link above- Pruitt was runner-up) but putting a dedicated enemy of the
environment in charge of the EPA, an agency he has sued on multiple
occasions, would seem a sure path to creating an important
world-class enemy.
8. Paul Singer-
vulture capitalist. A public enemy who works mostly outside the
public scrutiny, the world's leading vulture capitalist has brought
misery to a number of nations from Congo to Argentina and most
recently has been involved in creating and/or exploiting the economic
crisis in Puerto Rico.
7. Rupert
Murdoch- He's getting old and possibly mellower, considering that
Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly and Megyn Kelly have all departed his
realm, but Murdoch still controls a vast media network, which has
been responsible for lowering the standards of public discourse, and
of journalism, on at least three continents. Decades ago, few could
imagine how an ultra right wing agenda could be promoted with the
success he's had at it.
6. David and
Charles Koch*- Their private lives may feature different favorite
charities, but in their efforts to buy up the US Congress they act in
tandem. Whereas there are other oligarchs motivated in part by a
desire to bring about their own “better” vision of the future,
these two consistently seek to further enrich themselves by ruinously
exploiting natural resources and to do so they have no scruples about
corrupting elected officials.
5. a tie*: Mitch
McConnell, Senate Majority Leader and Tom Price, the new
Head of the Department of Health and Human Resources. While McConnell would make many lists as public enemy
number one, he may be on the way out. Both men are determined to
limit health care in America to the wealthy, while diverting the
savings from withheld care to tax giveaways to the super rich. Rumor
has it that as a young member of Congress, McConnell served his
constituents reasonably well. As so often happens in politics,
venality grows with seniority and today there is no corporate
lobbying effort that McConnell will turn away, no tactic too sleazy,
no hypocrisy by which he can be embarrassed. Greed having replaced
any moral compass he may have ever possessed, he is a dangerous man
to have leading the US Senate. If he succeeds in passing either the
umpteenth version of Trump Care or the anarchy-producing Affordable
Care Act Repeal, his political future will end as soon as a large
percentage of his Kentucky constituents realize that he has
eliminated their health care. Win or lose, Tom Price will be there
to reduce and even terminate health care for vast swaths of American
citizens. We have heard no rumors that in his youth Price was burdened by good intentions.
4. Grover
Norquist- Another enemy of democracy who flies under the radar.
In an earlier cartoon, I summarized the similar backgrounds, ideology
and careers of Grover Norquist and Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden was
eliminated by Navy seals but Norquist is still at large, conducting
weekly breakfasts for members of Congress where he induces them to
take a sworn oath, in violation of their oath to protect the people
and the Constitution of the United States, to never raise taxes.
This could reasonably be seen as fomenting treason but it's been
going on for years without prosecution. People often wonder how
could a rich country such as the USA allow its infrastructure to
decay to third world levels. Grover Norquist is a major factor.
3. Donald Trump-
President of the USA. More than enough has been said about this man
but as America's own Kim Jong Un, he does pose a credible threat to
the peace and stability of the world.
2. Paul Ryan-
While serial liars are not necessarily a threat to the Republic, when
one becomes Speaker of the House and therefore right behind the
Vice-President in line of succession to the presidency, it is time
for concern. Apparently, the lies of Trump are accepted by friends
and foes alike as the egocentric, mindless bluster of an adolescent
bully. His speech is almost completely content-free. Ryan instead
has the ability to recite endless sequences of verifiable non-facts,
without embarrassment, as he charms countless grandmothers across the
Midwest with his watery blue eyes, all the while doing contortions to
deprive them of social security and medicare. Even the venerable New
York Times describes him as a “policy wonk” despite his having
proposed a total government budget less than the current military
budget, but which increases military spending and slashes taxes, and
the whole thing would be balanced. He doesn't appear to be very
bright but his enviable acting skills have allowed him to synthesize
the two books he's read, 1984 and Atlas Shrugged into his public
persona of devout Roman Catholic who proclaims that greed is good and
the rich shall inherit the earth.
1. Kris Kobach-
A rising star on the enemies list, Kobach bears a greater
responsibility for Donald Trump's entry into the White House than the
collective effect of all the others blamed for it, from Putin to
Hillary, James Comey to Debbie Wassermann Schultz. As inventor and
administrator of Operation Crosscheck, Kobach was responsible for the
disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of US citizens, most of
them from the African-American, Latino, and Asian-American
communities. The suppressed vote in several decisive states was up
to ten times the winning margin in those states. He has now been
appointed to oversee the bogus prosecution of voter fraud, much as
the leading proponent of environmental degradation has been appointed
to oversee the EPA. Kobach and his GOP accomplices have built an
electoral system whose corruption may be insurmountable. Trump could
prove to be the most unpopular President in US history and the
Republican Congress may be reviled, but the chances of their being
removed by election grow ever more remote. Kobach embodies
intelligence in combination with pure evil. More than Trump, he may
become the face of American Fascism.
We don't mean to
slight our European friends or others but who is there outside the US
with both the will and the means to inflict as much damage as the
people on the above list. The EU and its members states have no
shortage of politicians who are foolish, incompetent, misguided,
venal or corrupt but few are infused with enthusiasm for the New
Feudalism, i.e. the endgame of the Neo-con lust for upward
redistribution of wealth and elimination of the middle class.
Ms. Le Pen might
have made the cut had she been elected to rule France but even she
responded to real problems, not of her own making, no matter how
odious some of her views may appear. In Europe there are still
political opponents, no matter how contrasting their positions. In
the US today, the big battles are with enemies, not opponents.
Perhaps confining
the enemies list to individuals was a mistake. Nations qualified as
military enemies in the past, but in today's globalized world where
nations have lost their clout, various other non-governmental
entities have stepped up to fill the void. A short list of groups
justifying surveillance and possible action by the Department of
Defense would surely include ALEC, the US Chamber of Commerce,
Goldman Sachs, Macquarie, Monsanto and AIPAC to join the already
singled out ISIS and Al Qaeda.
Our list also
excludes people still living who have inflicted more damage on the
world than most of our current finalists. George W. Bush and Dick
Cheney may have done more than any other living humans to promote the
New Feudalism but Bush now confines himself to painting oil portraits
of his pets,
his acquaintances and himself, while Cheney mostly
listens to the ticking of his mechanical heart between guest
appearances on Fox News. Barack Obama came close to ending the rule
of legislative democracy with his ISDS courts poisoning his proposed
trade agreements but, alas, like so many others, those plans fell
short. Hillary Clinton did enduring damage as Secretary of State,
most evident here in Italy, but her current opportunities in
mischief-making lie essentially in keeping the Democratic Party in
the hands of its Neo-con wing to assure continued control of the US
Government by the now openly Fascistic Republican Party.
What are the
solutions to the enemy crisis? The Military Industrial Complex
exists, ostensibly, to combat the enemies of the nation, but if the
enemies reside mostly within the nation, and mostly in government
itself, how can it fulfill its mission? If drone attacks can
eliminate obscure potential terrorists in Pakistan, how difficult
would surgical strikes be in Washington DC? Not difficult at all,
but no doubt unconstitutional. Whether it's the nostalgia of old age
for the discarded Constitution or simply our inherent conservatism,
we do not yet recommend that our armed forces be turned on our
internal enemies.
Given that our
military services have no legitimate function without plausible
enemies, as a moderate alternative to using them against our internal
enemies, we would propose supporting our troops by bringing them home
and helping them to find real jobs. Slash the military budget by 60
or 70 % immediately, end foreign occupations, ban the sale of weapons
abroad, and curtail all military foreign aid. This would create a
momentary surge of unemployment and put severe downward pressure on
MIC stocks but it would free up vast amounts of money for useful
things currently underfunded, such as health care, education and
infrastructure. We could even rehabilitate the Peace Corps. It
would spread good will and improve foreign relations in most of the
world.
Alas, neither
solution is likely to be adopted, although the militarization of
municipal police forces during the Bush years shows that there was
consideration of diverting the military mission to combating
perceived domestic enemies. Over the past century that approach has
been tried all around the world, from Russia, China, and Germany to
most of Latin America. The outcomes have been nothing we would want
to emulate.
In an effort to
generate useful enemies, the US Congress has voted additional
sanctions against Russia and is attempting, in a rare bi-partisan
effort, to make it a felony, with draconian penalties, to support
Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions campaigns in protest of Israel's
violations of international law. Well, so much for the First
Amendment protections of free speech. Perhaps the best we can hope
for is that the rest of the world will unite to impose sanctions on
the USA until it modifies its rogue state demeanor. If not, the
world may just have to wait for the US to self-destruct, praying that
it does not take the entire planet down with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment